Old Email Archive
Return to old archive list
digest 2006-01-12 #001.txt
litsci-l-digest Thursday, January 12 2006 Volume 01 : Number
134
In this issue:
Understanding the 9/11 Perpetrators
CFPs: MLA Division of Lit & Sci
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 14:10:45 -0500
From: "Richard A. Koenigsberg, Ph. D."
Subject: Understanding the 9/11 Perpetrators
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
- ------=_NextPart_000_014C_01C61526.7BF0FF90
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
UNDERSTANDING THE 9/11 PERPETRATORS:
Crazy, Lost in Hate, or Martyred?
By Clark McCauley, Ph.D., Professor of Psychology, Bryn Mawr College
Director of the Solomon Asch Center for Ethnopolitical Conflict at the
University of Pennsylvania
In bookstores, one discovers hundreds of volumes explaining how to raise
self-esteem, improve relationships, lose weight, etc. On TV, we have
Oprah
and Dr. Phil. Yet in the field of international relations--where
collective
forms of violence threaten to terminate the human race--we hear barely a
peep from psychology or psychologists. Isn't this extraordinary?
The objective of the IDEOLOGIES OF WAR & TERROR WEBSITE is to introduce
psychology into the domain of international relations and study of
societal
violence.
I am pleased to present this paper by Professor Clark McCauley--one of
the
most illuminating I have ever read on the thinking that generated the
9/11
terrorist attacks.
Excerpts appear below.
The complete paper is available for the first time as an online
publication.
PLEASE CLICK HERE
or visit:
http://ideologiesofwar.com/papers/cm_understanding.htm
With best regards,
Richard Koenigsberg
P. S. To receive the IDEOLOGIES OF WAR AND TERROR NEWSLETTER & to
subscribe
to the IDEOLOGIES OF WAR AND TERROR LISTSERV send an e-mail to
oanderson@ideologiesofwar.com
____________________________________________________________________________
____________________
"ATTA'S MANUAL"
Found in the personal belongings of several of the 9/11 attackers were
copies of the same four-page handwritten document, a kind of manual for
the
attack. The author of the document is not known with certainty, although
it
has sometimes been attributed to Mohammed Atta as the presumed leader of
the
9/11 operation.
The first and perhaps most surprising aspect of the manual is that it is
does not incite or even approve of hatred of the enemy. There is no list
of
outrages to justify the mission. There is no mention of infidels in
Saudi
Arabia, or children dying in Iraq, or U.S. support for Israel. On the
contrary, the manual argues explicitly against individual motivation
based
in personal feelings: "Do not act out of a desire for vengeance for
yourself. Let your action instead be for the sake of God."
Not only does the manual not encourage hatred of the enemy, it actually
warns against acting out of hatred or vengeance. Indeed the manual does
not
identify any specific enemy. The manual's references to the enemy do not
support the idea that the 9/11 attackers were motivated by hatred of the
enemy. Overall, the emotional quality of the manual is positive, rather
than
negative. Hate, anger, and vengeance are discouraged; submission to God
and
sacrifice in accord with God's will are encouraged.
PRAYER
Prayer is generally understood as lifting up heart and mind to God, and
at
least ninety percent of the lines in the manual fit this description.
Prayer
is enjoined at every point in the manual, including the instruction to
stay
awake the night before the attack to spend the whole night in prayer.
In style as well as content, the manual is a prayer. But the manual is
more
than spiritual encouragement. It describes a contract, or at least a
compact, between the attackers and their God. The attackers will be
martyrs
in the Muslim tradition of martyrs. One who dies with the correct
intention,
that is, doing the will of Allah, is brought immediately to paradise.
In sum, the contract advanced in the manual is this: a man who gives his
life in the path of Allah is a martyr who trades the pain and
disappointments of human existence for release from sin and glory in
heaven.
Considered strictly as a contract, this is an attractive proposition.
Life can be more difficult than death; ".to Some, Not to be martyrs, is
martyrdom" (John Donne). Death in the flash of impact and explosion can
be
easier than withstanding torture in an enemy's prison, easier than
watching
loved ones suffering pain, shame, or disease.
Although it seems plausible that one emotion can overwhelm another, that
anger or hatred can be so strong as to overwhelm fear of death, the
evidence
suggests that this popular interpretation is simply not correct. It is
not
hatred of the enemy that conquers fear; it is love of God and the
promise of
paradise.
The 9/11 attacks are not to be understood as the product of individual
pathology or pathological hatred. Polls suggest that only relatively few
Muslims may hate the U.S., but even if the 9/11 attackers came from
among
those few, the attackers themselves, as judged by Atta's manual, did not
act
out of hate. Rather they understood themselves to be doing God's will;
they
gave their lives in a rush for paradise rather than for the satisfaction
of
punishing their enemies.
There is no mystery about why and how people kill others for political
causes; the mystery is to understand how people can be ready to kill
themselves for such causes. Most of us who are living comfortable lives
cannot take the first step in being ready: we cannot imagine killing
ourselves. But recent examples make this kind of imagination easier.
All of us are going to die; 9/11 means that more will be willing to die
sooner for a cause that can give meaning to life. As the strong get
stronger, the warfare of the weak will try to match high-tech weapon
systems
with more human weapons.
Please send comments and reflections to Orion Anderson at: :
OAnderson@IdeologiesofWar.com
_____
- -
+-+-+-+-+-+
Please see the following URL for the LITSCI-L archive, Web resource
links and unsubscribing info:
http://www.law.duke.edu/sls
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 12:30:26 -0500
From: Arielle Saiber
Subject: CFPs: MLA Division of Lit & Sci
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
- --Boundary_(ID_V5lagKOYYnPfXMdTju9xBw)
Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
The three panels the MLA Division of Literature & Science has organized
for MLA 2006 (Philadelphia) are the following. Abstracts are due by
March 15, 2006.
*Peak Oil and Post-Prosperity: Discourses of Depletion*:
Papers on rhetorics and narratives of peak-/post-oil and energy issues
in geoscience, literature, film, cultural commentary: neo-Malthusianism
(the great die-off), neopastoralism, etc. Abstracts or 8-page papers and
brief bio by March 15 to Martha Stoddard Holmes, mstoddar@csusm.edu
.
*Posthuman, All Too Posthuman*
Papers on the "posthuman" in literature and science: networks, systems,
and assemblages; embodiment and prostheses; animals, nature, and
environment; posthuman futures, pasts, and presents; posthumanities
scholarship. Abstracts by March 15 to Henry Turner, _hsturner@wisc.edu
_.
*
Ciphernetics: Signs, Codes, Texts*
Papers on any aspect of information technology, digital models,
encoding, decoding, semiotics, new paradigms of expression and
communication. Abstracts by March 15 to Arielle Saiber,
asaiber@bowdoin.edu .
------------------------------
End of litsci-l-digest V1 #134
******************************
-
+-+-+-+-+-+
Please see the following URL for the LITSCI-L archive, Web resource
links and unsubscribing info:
http://www.law.duke.edu/sls
